How can there be real leaks but at the same time be fake news about those leaks? Are the true leaks somehow fake? Do the true leaks somehow metamorphose into fake leaks, or does the fake news somehow switch into true news? Or is it some combination of the leaks and news that becomes mentally unstable? Is it Nake Fews or Leal Reaks?
How about terrorist attacks in Bowling Green? Maybe Green Bowling? Or was it terrorist activity in Sweden? Or was it in pig Latin, Weden-say? It's hard to keep track of which is fake news and which is truthful. Is it the national media or is it the Trump administration pronouncements that are phony? I hear sentences stated by one Trump advisor who claims another Trump appointee is explaining something with alternative facts.
Just what is an alternative fact? If you state a fact, what would be the alternative of that fact? The opposite of that fact would be an untruth, which is in fact, a lie. Now, I don't mean to be picky, but if something is mentioned in the national media and is proven to be true, and then along comes a Trump appointee to claim the opposite, wouldn't that be a lie? If one appointee makes a claim and the second says that was just an alternative fact, isn't that just using different words to try to hide the fact that the first appointee lied?
How important is the size of an inaugural crowd? How important is the size of the victory in the electoral college vote? Does the president get extra points for the biggest crowd or the most votes? Does that mean he gets to go first in the lunch line? Aside from a few historians, who would have known a hundred years from now? Or twenty years? Who would care?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment